Ethanfel/ComfyUI-SelVA
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: note AudioX shows no perceptual quality gain on V2A vs SelVA

Browse Source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ethanfel
2026-04-07 09:12:00 +02:00
parent af4777d2d7
commit 82fb7a0009
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/audiox_evaluation.md
+3 -1
View File
@@ -64,7 +64,9 @@ This is not a quality difference per se; flow matching is simply more efficient.
AudioX benchmarks claim superior results on text-to-audio (AudioCaps) and text-to-music AudioX benchmarks claim superior results on text-to-audio (AudioCaps) and text-to-music
(MusicCaps) vs prior models. Video-to-audio comparison against MMAudio specifically is not (MusicCaps) vs prior models. Video-to-audio comparison against MMAudio specifically is not
prominently featured in the paper, which suggests SelVA remains competitive there. prominently featured in the paper. Perceptual evaluation confirms this: AudioX does not sound
noticeably better than SelVA on video-to-audio tasks. AudioX's advantage is **breadth**
(music, inpainting, variable duration), not raw video-to-audio quality.
--- ---