docs: note AudioX shows no perceptual quality gain on V2A vs SelVA
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -64,7 +64,9 @@ This is not a quality difference per se; flow matching is simply more efficient.
|
||||
|
||||
AudioX benchmarks claim superior results on text-to-audio (AudioCaps) and text-to-music
|
||||
(MusicCaps) vs prior models. Video-to-audio comparison against MMAudio specifically is not
|
||||
prominently featured in the paper, which suggests SelVA remains competitive there.
|
||||
prominently featured in the paper. Perceptual evaluation confirms this: AudioX does not sound
|
||||
noticeably better than SelVA on video-to-audio tasks. AudioX's advantage is **breadth**
|
||||
(music, inpainting, variable duration), not raw video-to-audio quality.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user