ComfyUI-Ethanfel-Prompt-Builder/docs/krea2-prompt-guide.md

Krea2 Prompt Guide

This document records prompt rules discovered from actual SxCP generator outputs tested in Krea2. It is not a generic prompt cookbook. Add a rule only when an A/B image comparison shows that the wording improves or breaks Krea2 behavior.

Core Rule

Krea2 responds best when the prompt gives one clear visual hierarchy:

1. subject/cast descriptor,
2. action or pose,
3. clothing state,
4. location,
5. camera/layout,
6. expression,
7. composition/crop,
8. style.

Avoid letting two sections describe incompatible camera or framing intents.

Prompt Output Contract

• sxcp_eval_out must contain only the prompt being tested.
• Analysis, scoring, and generator notes belong in chat or sxcp_eval_log.
• Keep one experiment variable per cycle when possible.
• Lock sampler seed, character, location, and camera when testing wording changes.
• Treat the MCP seed as transport metadata. Preserve it for prompt-only A/B tests and do not write it into the visible prompt text.

Positive-Only Conditioning

Never put negative-conditioning phrases inside the positive Krea2 prompt. A positive prompt should describe only the visual elements that should appear. Do not write phrases such as no shaft, no hands, without clothing, or avoid X into sxcp_eval_out; for distilled Krea2, those phrases can reinforce or hallucinate the unwanted object.

This SxCP loop has no active negative-output contract. A same-positive, same-seed probe on seed 424242 compared empty negative conditioning against strong negative text targeting visible prompt attributes, and the rendered images stayed visually unchanged. For this workflow, keep Krea2 pose fixes in positive wording only.

Seed-Controlled A/B Tests

Use one fixed sampler seed when deciding whether prompt wording helped Krea2. If the SxCP generator/control seed differs from the sampler seed, record it as generator_seed in the eval log. A single image can justify a prompt-only retry when the mismatch is obvious, but a generator rule needs either repeated evidence or a generated prompt that is structurally wrong before rendering.

When a workflow batches soft/hard prompts through an index switch, sidecar text files may not be the exact prompt used for each rendered image. If the sidecar and image disagree, inspect the PNG workflow metadata and the final text encode input before patching the generator.

When reviewing an eval payload, log:

• emitted sampler seed,
• generator/control seed when it differs,
• original generated prompt,
• edited prompt,
• image failure or improvement,
• whether the change should stay prompt-only or become a generator patch.

Evidence Promotion Threshold

Do not promote a single-character, single-location prompt hack into a durable guide rule. A prompt-only fix can be recorded as accepted when it cleanly improves the fixed-seed image, but a general wording rule needs either repeated evidence across distinct subjects/locations or a source prompt that is structurally wrong before rendering.

Scene repair words must match the selected location. Do not use a bedroom, bedding, couch, shower, car, or other scene anchor to solve a foreground problem inside an office/coworking setup unless that anchor is already present in the selected scene. If the model needs a foreground filler to avoid hallucinating extra anatomy, choose an anchor from the actual location or keep the result as an inconclusive prompt-only retry.

Camera And Composition

Orbit / Multiangle Camera

When Krea2 receives an orbit or multiangle camera, avoid selfie-specific wording unless the intended camera is actually a handheld or mirror selfie.

Works better:

• lifestyle portrait frame
• creator portrait frame
• outfit-check pose
• wide environmental coworking camera layout
• camera placed several meters away
• full seated body from head to knees
• room depth surrounding the subject

Conflicting wording:

• selfie frame
• phone selfie
• holding the phone
• creator-shot phone photo
• handheld camera realism

Observed result: selfie words pulled a back-right elevated wide shot into an arm-length selfie. Removing selfie terms made the image follow the rear-quarter view much better.

Wide Shots

Krea2 tends to keep attractive subjects large in frame. To get a real wide or environmental frame, be explicit about distance and visible environment.

Useful phrasing:

• camera placed several meters away across the desk aisle
• full seated body from head to knees remains visible
• nearby desk edge, laptop corner, repeated desk rows, and tall-window depth clearly readable
• wide environmental room framing

Avoid relying on wide shot alone.

Location Layout

Location-aware camera text works when it describes the room around the subject without stealing the foreground from the subject.

For coworking lounge:

• Keep warm desks, laptop tables, glass partition seams, repeated desk rows, plants, and tall windows.
• Mention foreground anchors only when the camera should actually see them.
• In POV, keep location anchors beside or behind the bodies, not in the lower foreground.

Clothing Continuity

When a softcore outfit is reused in a later branch, name what happens to actual outfit pieces instead of using generic fabric language.

Works better:

• denim shorts are pulled aside or removed below the hips
• button-down shirt tied at the waist and fitted bralette remain visible from the same outfit

Avoid generic fallback wording:

• fabric slipping off
• partly exposed
• outfit pushed aside where needed

Use generic wording only when no source outfit exists.

Climax / Ejaculation Wording

Krea2 needs the visible fluid action stated directly in climax routes. Keep semen in the action sentence when the generator intends an ejaculation or post-ejaculation image.

Works better:

• the man ejaculates semen across her body
• visible semen lands across her body
• ejaculates semen across her lower back, ass, and thighs

Avoid relying only on softer aftermath wording:

• visible ejaculation
• visible orgasm aftermath
• cum on hands and body

Seed 42052 exposed this as a structural formatter issue: the route selected a standing/kneeling climax pose, but the Krea prompt dropped semen and kept only generic aftermath language. The generator now preserves direct ejaculates semen wording for this path before the prompt reaches Krea2.

Ready / Post-Ejaculation Open-Thigh Display

The ready atlas folder is not a neutral setup pose. Treat it as a still post-ejaculation open-thigh display where the fluid-covered exposed opening is the first visual priority and the active lower-foreground action is secondary.

Works better:

• POV post-ejaculation open-thigh display
• the wet aftermath detail is the exact center
• thick semen and clear fluid cover the exposed pussy and inner thighs
• her body stays still after ejaculation
• her face and torso remain visible behind the open-thigh frame
• office chair seat and chair arms frame the lower foreground
• desk edges, laptop tables, glass partitions, plants, and tall-window depth

Failure modes:

• generic ready or setup-before-sex wording
• active penetration or thrusting becoming the main read
• fluid detail present but secondary to a lower-foreground body cue
• bedroom/bedding anchors inserted into coworking scenes
• closed thighs or cropped torso hiding the atlas open-thigh display

Fixed-seed finding: CodexMCPTest source subject 52 with sampler seed 1123581321 produced first ready/aftermath evidence. The generic baseline kept the coworking scene and open-thigh pose, but collapsed into active lower-foreground penetration with fluid secondary. The accepted candidate made the wet aftermath detail the primary visual event while preserving the office-chair/coworking setting. Under the category-exit rule this is mirrored into the generator as a provisional improvement over baseline, while the catalog route remains candidate pending broader repetition.

Spread / Open-Thigh Presentation

The spread atlas folder is a direct camera-facing presentation pose. The key read is the leg geometry first: raised knees or wide thighs form a V-frame toward the viewer, hands hold the knees or thighs, and the face and torso remain visible behind the open-thigh frame.

Works better:

• knees raised and held wide
• thighs form a broad V-frame around the centered exposed vulva
• hands hold her knees and upper thighs
• face and torso remain visible behind the open-thigh frame
• office chair seat and chair arms frame the lower foreground
• desk edges, laptop tables, glass partitions, plants, and tall-window depth

Failure modes:

• low seated spread with legs open but no raised-knee V-frame
• missing hands, or hands not anchoring the knees/thighs
• outfit remaining closed over the center of the pose
• partner/contact wording competing with the camera-facing presentation
• scene repair words that turn the coworking office into a bedroom setup

Fixed-seed finding: CodexMCPTest source subjects 50 and 47 with sampler seed 3141592653 showed the atlas hierarchy improved over generic spread wording on two visible subjects. Source 50 already produced a coherent low seated spread, but the candidate added hands on raised knees and a stronger V-frame. Source 47 failed baseline exposure because the shorts stayed closed; the candidate opened the center and added raised knees and hand anchors. The generator now carries this as a provisional improvement over baseline, while the catalog route remains candidate pending a wider V-frame repeat on another seed.

POV Outercourse

Ballsucking / Testicle Sucking

The atlas examples are low first-person pelvis views. The visible partner should read as bent forward between the viewer's open thighs, with the chest low over the viewer's pelvis and the face placed below the shaft at testicle height. Starting from the viewer or using only generic kneeling language can make the head float too high.

Works better:

• the woman bends forward and kneels very low between the viewer's open thighs
• chest low over the viewer's pelvis
• face is below the viewer's penis at testicle height
• head below the shaft base, chin near the viewer's pelvis
• mouth lower than the shaft base and aligned to the underside/scrotum
• balls fill the exact center foreground as the largest contact object
• lips and tongue press to the scrotum and balls
• shaft is cropped to the side as a landmark, away from her lips
• composition priority is balls first, scrotum contact second, woman's low face third

Partial side-low axis:

• low side-pelvis POV
• face is the closest visible partner part
• cheek against the viewer's inner thigh
• scrotum and testicles centered against her tongue and lips
• balls fill the lower center foreground at her mouth
• viewer abdomen and inner thighs close around her face

Avoid:

• head tucked under the penis shaft without testicle-height wording
• generic kneels in front of him
• making the viewer the main subject before the visible woman is established
• mid-height head placement
• making the raised shaft the centered visual target above her mouth
• repeating shaft/hand-on-shaft wording before the scrotum/testicle contact is visually established
• hanging or pressed from above wording when it creates suspended-object artifacts
• two testicles against tongue if it turns into wrong rounded anatomy or a different body layout

Fixed-seed finding: sampler seed 238365845574312 showed that low-head wording improves body placement, but Krea2 can still collapse into generic shaft-focused oral contact when the raised shaft stays centered above the mouth. The accepted prompt made the scrotum/balls the largest exact-center object and moved the shaft to a cropped side landmark. Keep this as a prompt-guide rule, but do not promote the catalog route to proven until the rule repeats on another controlled seed.

Expansion weak case: sampler seed 1212121212 repeated across two women did not validate the side-cropped scrotum rule. The candidates made the balls and scrotum larger, but the head stayed too high and the mouth still targeted the shaft/glans. Literal wording like sucking the testicles with her mouth helped one result move the shaft off-axis, but it still used tongue-to-base contact with the head too high. Next tests should avoid label-like testicle-sucking position wording and make head height the primary axis: head below the shaft base, chin near the viewer pelvis, mouth lower than the balls/scrotum contact point.

Threshold search update: sampler seed 1212121212 then received about fifty positive-only prompt probes on one subject plus six repeats on a second subject. The under-base, chin-near-pelvis, hand-held-side, and direct balls in mouth wording families mostly collapsed back to generic shaft/glans oral contact. The repeatable partial axis was the side-low family: low side-pelvis POV, cheek against the viewer's inner thigh, and scrotum/testicles centered against her tongue and lips. Turns 149, 162, 167, and 170 show that this can move the contact toward the balls/scrotum, and tongue-on-testicles is an accepted improvement over the baseline shaft/glans collapse. Mirror this side-low partial axis into the generator provisionally, but keep the route queued for broader seed/source expansion because it still does not reliably produce lips fully wrapped around the testicles.

Generated-route validation: turn 172 showed that the first generator patch could keep tongue/testicle contact low but still let the woman's torso dominate the composition. Adding face is the closest visible partner part produced turn 173, where the face stayed low beside the viewer's thigh and the tongue/testicle contact remained centered. Keep the face-priority cue in the generator wording and continue testing because body/rear prominence can still steal the pose.

Fresh-seed side-camera weak case: sampler seed 5757575757 repeated the generated side-low route and three contact-priority variants across two women. Turns 217-224 looked strong as side-camera oral views: the face stayed low between the viewer abdomen/thigh foreground, coworking depth held, and the cheek/inner-thigh relationship stayed readable. They did not improve exact ballsucking contact because the mouth and tongue still targeted the shaft/glans. Record this as useful side-view oral wording, not proof that text alone controls the testicle-contact object. Bookmark: docs/krea2-visual-bookmarks/ballsucking-side-camera-turn221-side-low-oral-weakcase.png.

Fresh-seed partial update: sampler seed 6262626262 retested the route across two visible women with twelve positive-only probes. The generated-route controls on turns 250 and 256 preserved the low coworking side-pelvis view but still drifted toward shaft/glans oral contact. The best repeatable branch was turns 252 and 258:

• scrotum is the mouth surface
• testicles resting across her open lips
• tongue cups them from below
• head lies sideways on the viewer's inner thigh
• chin close to the viewer pelvis

This is still a partial, not a proven full mouth-wrapped testicle-sucking result. It is better than the generated-route controls because the contact moves toward the scrotum/testicles while retaining the atlas side-low cheek/thigh relationship. Turns 253 and 259 showed a useful secondary tongue-cradle underside branch, but it reads more centered/frontal than the side-low atlas family. Patch the provisional generator route to the open-lips scrotum-surface hierarchy and keep the route queued for more seeds.

Generated-route validation: turns 262 and 263 rendered the patched route wording directly after the generator edit. Both validation renders kept the low side face/thigh relationship and moved the tongue/lip contact to the underside scrotum/testicle area with less shaft-tip dominance than the generated-route controls on turns 250 and 256. Keep this as a provisional improvement, not a proven route, because the result remains tongue/lips-on-testicles rather than fully mouth-wrapped testicle sucking.

Fresh-seed target-object repeat: sampler seed 9797979797 retested the current open-lips route and four target-object branches across two visible women. The generated-route control could succeed on turn 286, but the blonde control on turn 291 still drifted toward shaft/base contact. The best repeatable branch was scrotum_skin_to_lips on turns 288 and 293:

• scrotal skin is the nearest mouth surface
• both testicles rest against her tongue from below
• cheek and jaw compressed into the thigh
• chin tucked close to the pelvis

Treat this as a narrow target-object refinement, not a full solution. It improves the partial hierarchy over the weak control while preserving side-low cheek/thigh geometry, but it still reads as tongue/lips-on-testicles rather than fully mouth-wrapped testicle sucking. The balls_first_center_object branch is unsafe as default because turn 290 overfit into a multi-subject or body-layout artifact.

Generated-route validation: sampler seed 9898989898 rendered the patched scrotal-skin route directly across two visible women. turns 296 and 297 both preserved side-low cheek/thigh geometry, kept the face low between viewer abdomen and inner-thigh cues, and placed scrotum/testicles at the tongue/lip contact surface. This validates the route patch as a target-object improvement, but it remains partial because the result is still tongue/lips-on-testicles, not fully mouth-wrapped testicle sucking.

Fresh-seed weak case: sampler seed 5959595959 retested the current generated route and three stronger mouth-contact axes across three visible women. The generated controls on turns 307, 311, and 315 kept useful low-pelvis framing but still drifted toward shaft/glans contact. The lip-oval branch on turns 308, 312, and 316 made the scene more upright and shaft-centered. The sideways mouth pocket branch on turns 309, 313, and 317 preserved the best cheek/thigh side-low geometry, but the mouth still targeted the shaft or base rather than wrapping the testicles. The chin-pelvis upward seal branch on turns 310, 314, and 318 became a frontal shaft-focused oral read. Do not patch the generator from these branches; record this as another target-object weak case and continue exploring stronger control or a different positive wording axis.

Fresh-seed occlusion weak case: sampler seed 6060606060 tested a different target-control strategy after the mouth-shape words failed. The generated controls on turns 319, 323, and 327 were still the best partials, preserving side-low geometry and some visible scrotum/testicle contact. The scrotum foreground occlusion branch on turns 320, 324, and 328 became upright shaft-centered oral instead of making the scrotum cover the mouth. The under-scrotum tongue shelf branch on turns 321, 325, and 329 kept some low-pelvis framing but still targeted the shaft/glans. The hand-guided scrotum branch on turns 322, 326, and 330 made hands and shaft ownership dominate. Do not patch these axes into the generator; future attempts should change the target-object strategy or use stronger control rather than adding more occlusion or hand-support synonyms.

Fresh-seed mouth-axis mixed case: sampler seed 6161616161 tested five new positive-only axes across three visible women after the occlusion/hand-support batch failed. The generated-route controls on turns 331 and 337 gave the best repeated partials: low pelvis framing, face close to the inner thigh, and tongue/testicle contact. The third generated control on turn 343 still collapsed onto shaft contact, so the route remains candidate.

Failed or non-repeatable axes:

• exact mouth-sucking: literal sucking the testicles with her mouth wording still became shaft/glans-focused on the clearest inspected branch.
• single-testicle: putting a single testicle between the lips did not make the model hold the testicle as the mouth target.
• hanging balls below shaft: separating the target below the lifted shaft mostly preserved shaft/glans oral.
• side mouth wrap: turn 335 produced a useful side-oriented partial, but turns 341 and 347 collapsed back to shaft contact.
• chin-pelvis lower-mouth target: turn 348 produced a useful frontal target-object partial with the mouth lower and testicles visible at the tongue/lip surface, but the branch is not repeatable enough for generator wording.

Conclusion: keep the current provisional generated route as the best repeated partial for now. Do not patch exact-mouth, single-testicle, hanging-balls, side-mouth-wrap, or chin-pelvis lower-mouth wording into the generator from this batch. The full mouth-wrapped target still needs broader expansion or stronger control.

Fresh-seed pelvis-valley weak case: sampler seed 7171717171 tested body-plane and camera-height wording after mouth-shape and target-object words kept failing. The useful atlas comparison was that refs such as 101 place the viewer flatter and lower, with the partner tucked into the pelvis valley between the thigh roots.

The flat pelvis-valley branch repeated the strongest spatial improvement on turns 350, 356, and 362:

• viewer reads flatter and more supine;
• inner thighs become side walls around her face;
• her face is tucked lower inside the thigh-wall pelvis valley;
• coworking depth remains location-compatible.

However, this was a body-plane correction, not a target-object correction. All three repeated flat-pelvis results still made the mouth target the shaft, so do not patch flat pelvis-valley into the ballsucking generator route as-is. Treat it as a useful orientation hint for stronger control or for a separate flat-pelvis oral branch.

Other branches from this batch were weaker:

• thigh tunnel and pubic-hair mouth-line wording mostly repeated the same shaft-centered target.
• low-cushion chin anchor drifted into wrong open-thigh/presentation geometry.
• pelvis-edge target-first also drifted toward open-thigh/presentation layout or target ambiguity.

Conclusion: body-plane wording can fix the atlas orientation while making the target object worse. Score these separately. For this route, the current side-low scrotal-skin generated wording remains the better ballsucking partial.

Fresh-seed flat-target hybrid weak case: sampler seed 7272727272 combined the best prior body-plane wording with the best prior target-object wording across three women. The tested branches were flat-valley scrotal-skin target, valley-floor open lips, upper-frame shaft lower-scrotum, cropped upper-shaft valley-mouth, and side-low flat-valley hybrid.

The hybrid did not beat the current generated route. The flat-valley scrotal-skin target branch repeated the flatter body-plane read on turns 368, 374, and 380, but all three stayed shaft-centered. The side-low flat-valley hybrid branch kept some useful side-low look hints on turns 372, 378, and 384, but the target contact remained ambiguous or shaft-centered. The upper-frame and cropped-shaft branches also reinforced the wrong target.

Conclusion: stop the ballsucking text-only prompt loop here for now. Keep the current side-low scrotal-skin partial as the provisional generator route, keep the pose queued as candidate/weak, and treat the full target as likely needing stronger control rather than more positive-prompt synonyms.

Footjob

The atlas examples are frontal first-person views. The viewer reclines with thighs framing the lower foreground, the woman sits opposite with her body and face behind her feet, and the feet are the main contact object around the upright shaft.

Works better:

• tight frontal POV footjob close-up
• large overlapping soles dominate the lower center foreground
• upright shaft compressed between the two soles
• a narrow vertical strip of shaft and glans rises between her pressed soles
• inner arches and toe pads press inward against the shaft
• toes curled around both edges of the shaft
• her face, torso, and open thighs remain visible behind her large foreground feet

Alternate branch:

• one bare foot crosses horizontally in front of the shaft
• sole presses sideways into the glans and upper shaft
• other foot braces from the opposite side near the base

Avoid:

• generic uses her feet on the viewer's penis without overlap/contact pressure
• soles on either side if it leaves the shaft standing free
• feet too small or too low at the base of the shaft
• hands or mouth competing with the feet as the active contact

Fixed-seed finding: sampler seed 238365845574312 showed that generic footjob wording can produce the correct frontal POV layout, but the feet may sit beside the shaft rather than visibly compressing it. The accepted prompt used large overlapping soles and a shaft trapped between the two soles, with only a narrow visible strip between the feet. Keep this as a prompt-guide rule, but do not promote the catalog route to proven until it repeats on another controlled seed.

Expansion finding: sampler seed 3434343434 repeated across two women showed the baseline was already a valid frontal POV footjob, but large two-sole clamp wording improved foot scale and contact compression on turns 176 and 180. The cross-foot side-press wording produced atlas-ref-86 style alternates on turns 177 and 181, but it is a separate branch and weaker as the default. Mirror the two-sole clamp wording into the generator provisionally and keep cross-foot wording as an alternate guide branch.

Generated-route correction: turn 183 showed that two large soles dominate is not enough by itself; the route can turn into feet presented to the viewer and hide the actual contact. Turns 184, 185, and 186 restored the target when the prompt said the soles clamp the upright shaft between them and the glans rises between the compressed feet. Turn 188 validated the patched generated route with the same cue: large soles stayed dominant while the shaft and contact remained readable. Keep that visibility cue in generator wording and treat cross-foot side-press as a separate alternate branch.

Fresh-seed route tightening: sampler seed 6868686868 repeated the generated route and three contact variants across two women. Turns 225 and 229 showed that the generated route can still hide the shaft/contact behind large soles. Turns 227 and 231 repeated the stronger default: large overlapping soles with a narrow visible strip of shaft and glans rising between the compressed feet. Turn 226 supported the same center-gap visibility axis; turns 228 and 232 kept cross-foot side-press useful as a separate alternate. Turn 233 validated the patched generated route with overlapping soles, the centered shaft/glans strip, viewer body cues, and coworking depth intact. The generator route now uses the overlapping-sole/narrow-strip wording.

Fresh-seed promotion: sampler seed 7373737373 repeated the patched generated route across two visible women. Turns 264 and 267 used the exact overlapping-sole/narrow-strip generated route and preserved large foreground sole dominance, visible centered shaft/glans strip, toe/arch pressure, face and torso behind the feet, and coworking depth. Turns 265 and 268 repeated the tight center-gap visible-glans branch as supporting evidence. Turns 266 and 269 remained valid cross-foot side-press alternates, but they are not the default because they give up the two-sole enclosure. Treat the default frontal footjob route as proven; keep cross-foot side-press as an alternate guide branch.

Fingering / Manual Stimulation

The atlas examples are close first-person manual-contact views. The visible partner reclines with open thighs toward the camera, one foreground hand enters from the lower frame, and the hand is the main contact object. Generic male-participant POV wording can make Krea2 insert lower-foreground anatomy that competes with the hand.

Works better:

• single foreground hand is the largest lower-frame object
• wrist entering from bottom center
• two fingers placed at her vulva and clit as the clear contact point
• open thighs forming a V around one camera-side hand
• manual contact first, open-thigh geometry second, woman face and torso third
• office-chair support and coworking depth fourth

For coworking or office scenes, keep the foreground and depth anchors from the selected location:

• black office chair seat and chair arms frame the lower foreground
• near desk edge
• laptop table corners
• glass partition seams
• repeated desk rows
• plants and tall-window depth

Failure modes:

• generic viewer fingers her wording without hand scale or ownership
• male-participant POV language that makes the lower foreground the main subject
• bedding or soft-surface anchors inside an office/coworking scene
• multiple foreground body cues competing with the active hand

Fixed-seed finding: sampler seed 238365845574312 repeated across CodexMCPTest source subjects 46 and 47. In both baselines, generic fingering/manual-contact wording collapsed into shaft-forward lower-foreground anatomy. The accepted prompt kept the coworking scene intact and changed only the hierarchy: one large foreground hand, open thighs, woman face/torso, then office-chair/coworking depth. Keep this as a prompt-guide rule, but do not promote the catalog route to proven until it repeats on another seed or location family.

Matrix update: CodexMCPTest source subject 50 with sampler seed 987654321 repeated the same pattern. The generic baseline kept the coworking setting but collapsed into shaft/body-dominant lower-foreground anatomy; the hand-first candidate preserved the coworking office setting and produced readable active fingers. This strengthens the prompt-guide rule and adds the required second sampler seed. The manual/fingering generator now carries this hierarchy as a provisional improvement over baseline, while the catalog route remains candidate until broader evidence proves it.

Weak-case update: CodexMCPTest source subject 52 with sampler seed 1357913579 shows the current rule is still too early for generator mirroring. The generic baseline failed in the same lower-foreground way, and a camera-side hand-first candidate still kept the wrong lower-foreground anatomy dominant. A second candidate succeeded only after making the active hand explicitly the woman's own right hand and using the office chair cushion/arms as the positive lower-frame structure. Keep this as a prompt note, not a generator rule for the participant-hand POV route, because the successful candidate changed hand ownership semantics.

Experimental generator-mirror probe: generator seed 4303 with sampler seed 238365845574312 showed that a generated-route prompt using the hand-first hierarchy can preserve the office/coworking setting and remove the shaft-forward foreground artifact from generic baselines. This is not enough to justify a production generator patch. Collect a broader seed, subject, and location matrix before changing route code for this case.

Wand Toy Contact

The atlas examples are close first-person toy-contact views. The visible partner reclines or sits back with open thighs toward the camera, face and torso behind the leg frame, and one foreground hand holds a wand-style massager with the rounded head at the central contact point.

Works better:

• single continuous teal wand-style massager is the largest lower-frame object
• rounded bulb head presses flat to her vulva and clit as the central contact point
• smooth handle angles in from the bottom right inside the viewer's visible hand
• open thighs and knees form a V around the foreground wand
• wand head contact first, open-thigh geometry second, visible hand and handle third
• woman face and torso fourth, coworking depth fifth

For coworking or office scenes, reuse the location anchors instead of adding bedroom surface cues:

• office chair seat and chair arms frame the lower foreground
• desk edges
• laptop tables
• glass partitions
• plants and tall-window depth

Failure modes:

• generic handheld wand vibrator is used near her without device continuity
• Krea2 splitting the cue into a contact toy plus a second wand-like foreground object
• toy floating without a visible hand or handle
• the woman holding the toy when the intended view is a foreground viewer hand
• mouth, foot, penetration, or manual-contact wording competing with the wand

Fixed-seed finding: CodexMCPTest source subject 48 with sampler seed 246813579 produced first wand evidence. The generic baseline preserved the coworking setting and found a toy-contact pose, but split the prompt into two wand-like objects. The accepted candidate made one continuous teal wand device the primary lower-frame object, with a readable handle grip and bulb-head contact. Treat this as first prompt-guide evidence only; repeat it on another source or seed before changing generator defaults.

Expansion finding: sampler seed 8642086420 repeated the teal lower-right single-device axis across two visible women on turns 190 and 194, improving over generic baselines 189 and 193. The black close-bulb wording drifted toward face/mouth contact, while the upper-left pale wand is useful as an atlas-107 alternate but weaker as a default. Turn 197 validated the patched generated route from generator row seed 46: one continuous teal wand, visible viewer hand, central bulb contact, and coworking office-chair depth all survived. Mirror this axis into the generator provisionally and keep the route queued for another source/seed expansion.

Proven-route repeat: sampler seed 7979797979 repeated the generated teal lower-right route across two women on turns 234 and 238. Device continuity, visible viewer hand/handle, central bulb-head contact, open-thigh chair geometry, visible subject, and coworking depth all survived. Contact-first teal variants on 235 and 239 also worked. The white upper-left branch repeated on 236 and 240 as a valid alternate for atlas refs with diagonal handle entry. The large-bulb branch on 237 and 241 is rejected as the default because it can hide exact contact and overtake the lower frame. The catalog route is now proven with the teal lower-right single-continuous-device default.

Boobjob / Titjob

The atlas examples are frontal and upright: the visible partner faces the viewer, kneels between the viewer's thighs, and compresses the shaft between the breasts. Forward-bent wording can still place the body correctly, but it weakens the breast contact.

Works better:

• POV boobjob position
• woman kneels upright between his legs facing him
• penis rises vertically in the lower foreground
• squeezed between her pressed-together breasts
• woman's own fingers and nails cup her breasts from the outside
• glans emerging above the cleavage directly below her mouth

Avoid vague or conflicting wording:

• torso bent forward over his pelvis
• both hands push her breasts without naming whose hands
• only foreground hands when the intended hands are the woman's hands

Handjob

The atlas examples are direct and simple: the woman faces the viewer between his thighs, her hand is the visible contact point, and her face or torso stays behind the shaft. In fixed-seed tests, naming one hand plus a generic POV camera line could make the lower hand read as the viewer's hand. Naming the woman's hands made the action clearer.

Works better:

• POV handjob position
• woman kneels between his legs facing him
• the woman's right hand wraps around the viewer's penis
• her left hand steadies the base
• viewer thighs and pelvis frame the lower edges
• without his hands covering the action

Avoid:

• generic one hand grips when hand ownership matters
• allowing foreground hands to compete with the woman's active hand

POV

In POV prompts, the visible subject should still be established first. The POV participant is the camera viewpoint, not a normal visible cast member.

Works better:

• visible subject descriptor first,
• then POV action,
• then foreground hands/body/clothing cues.

For POV clothing, describe only visible body/clothing fragments:

• foreground hands, hips, thighs, or lowered waistband
• foreground hands, forearms, sleeves, or torso edge

Avoid:

• full third-person Man A wears... phrasing for the POV participant,
• making the viewer the first subject before the visible character is established.

For POV climax wording, the fluid target must follow the pose before expression tokens. Rear-entry, doggy, bent-over, face-down, and on-all-fours poses should target the ass, thighs, and lower back even if the expression detail mentions face, lips, mouth, or tongue.

Evidence:

• Dataset seed 52 generated an internally contradictory prompt: on-all-fours rear-view positioning paired with a face/chest ejaculation target.
• Corrected seed 52 and follow-up seed 5202 both rendered the rear-view target consistently when the wording used across her ass, thighs, and lower back and kept the clothing state tied to the lower garment.

Blowjob Top View / Overhead Vertical Shaft

The atlas examples are steep overhead first-person oral views. The useful structure is not generic kneeling oral and not just a vertical shaft; it is a nadir-angle standing male POV where the nearby floor plane dominates and the woman is directly below the viewer between his feet.

Works better:

• nadir-angle standing male POV top-view oral position
• viewer looks almost straight down from his torso toward the floor
• nearby carpet/floor plane dominates the image
• viewer abdomen, shorts, thighs, and feet frame the lower foreground
• shaft appears as a short centered vertical column from the foreground
• one woman kneels directly below the viewer between his feet
• hair crown, forehead, shoulders, hands, and knees are visible from above
• desk legs, chair wheels, carpet texture, and floor seams as top-down office anchors
• mouth seals around the centered shaft
• one hand wraps the base
• face, shoulders, and compact foreshortened torso remain readable beneath the shaft

Failure modes:

• generic kneeling oral that drifts into side-profile framing
• off-center shaft/mouth alignment
• hand present but not supporting the vertical centerline
• a close face crop that loses the viewer-underbody lower edge
• plumb-line or map wording that literalizes into drawn graphics

Fixed-seed finding: CodexMCPTest source subjects 46 and 47 with sampler seed 4242424242 showed that generic blowjob/oral wording can already produce a usable top-down image, but the atlas hierarchy tightened the shaft-to-mouth axis. Source 46 gained clearer hand-at-base structure; source 47 moved from a side-profile/off-center read into a centered vertical top-down read. The generator now carries this as a provisional improvement over baseline, while the catalog route remains candidate pending another seed.

Correction probes: a later same-seed source-46 probe showed that vertical center-shaft wording and generic steep-overhead wording can still feel too frontal or horizontal. A short axis loop found the stronger terms: nadir-angle or bird's-eye paired with standing male POV, floor plane dominates, nearby top-down office anchors, one woman directly below between his feet, and short centered vertical column. The plumb-line and map terms produced good geometry but literal drawn artifacts, so they should stay out of generator wording.

Blowjob Side Profile / Side-Phone Weak Case

Seed 5656565656 showed that current side-profile oral wording is good at a related composition, but that composition is not valid POV evidence for pov_blowjob_side_profile_oral. It reads like a side-phone or external side-camera shot taken from beside the man rather than a true first-person viewpoint from his eyes or body line.

Useful for a future non-POV route:

• side-phone oral composition
• external side-camera oral view
• woman kneels or leans beside the man's pelvis
• side-facing mouth and cheek profile remain readable
• office/coworking depth remains visible beside and behind the bodies

Visual bookmark: turn 202 blowjob-side-camera-turn202-awesome-side-phone.png is a strong side-camera / side-phone composition for a future non-POV route. It should not be counted as POV evidence, but it is a good look target for the side-camera family. The original output filename is also preserved as blowjob-side-camera-img_5a776aafda8f4a80ab12d995e4ce8020.png.

Do not count as POV evidence:

• attractive side-camera framing where the camera is beside the man
• the viewer's body appearing as a photographed subject rather than the camera owner
• side profile that loses the first-person lower-body viewpoint

Fixed-seed weak case: CodexMCPTest source subjects 46 and 47 with sampler seed 5656565656 produced four attractive side-phone / external side-camera renders. The stricter candidate improved profile readability in some ways but did not make the result more POV. Keep this wording for a later non-POV side-camera route; do not patch the POV generator from it.

Single-source improvement: the same seed on source 46 improved when the prompt made the foreground owner explicit as the adult male viewer:

• visible adult male chest, navel, abdomen hair, pelvis, and thighs form the central foreground surface
• woman lies on her side beside his left hip
• her torso lateral along the left edge of the frame
• side-facing mouth seals around the shaft near the center of the male abdomen
• one of her hands wraps the base directly below her lips

This produced an atlas-like first-person body-line view with the male abdomen and navel as the central foreground and the woman entering laterally from the side. Treat it as accepted single-source evidence, not a generator rule.

Fragility warning: source 47 on the same sampler seed rejected a related body-axis candidate because Krea2 transferred the body-axis cue to the woman's torso/body, producing a seated or straddling non-POV composition. Future side-profile oral tests should name the foreground owner repeatedly as the adult male viewer and verify that the woman's body stays lateral instead of becoming the central body surface.

Matrix update: sampler seed 9753197531 repeated the corrected side-profile body-line axis across two visible women. Generic baselines on turns 198 and 202 remained attractive side-phone or external side-camera reads. Pure male_body_axis wording on turns 199 and 203 was fragile because it could make the male read as the photographed subject. The repeatable winner was the lateral_edge_entry axis on turns 200 and 204: the male viewer's abdomen, navel, pelvis, and near thigh create a broad horizontal foreground body surface; the woman enters laterally from the left edge beside his hip; cheek and jaw stay in profile; mouth contact sits at the male abdomen line; and one hand stays around the base under her lips. Mirror this lateral-edge body-line hierarchy into the side-lying oral generator route provisionally, while keeping the variant queued for broader seed/source expansion.

Generated-route validation: turn 206 proved that the patched generated route can preserve the male abdomen body-line, lateral side-profile entry, and coworking depth, but it let the mouth/tongue float above the shaft while the hand became the contact anchor. Adding lips touching the shaft at the male abdomen line and mouth-to-shaft contact is the nearest facial detail produced turn 207, which preserved the body-line composition and moved the oral contact onto the shaft. Keep those contact-priority terms in the generator wording, and keep the route provisional because the result is still closer to mouth/tongue contact than fully mouth-wrapped side-profile oral.

Fresh-seed weak case: sampler seed 8484848484 retested the side-profile body-line route across two visible women. Generated-route turns 270 and 273 preserved some useful male body-line foreground and mouth contact, but still read partly as external side-camera compositions. Abdomen-line contact lock turns 271 and 274 made Krea2 transfer the body-line cue onto the woman's torso/body, so the woman became the photographed foreground subject. Lateral-edge mouth-first turns 272 and 275 improved attractive side-camera mouth contact, but the male appeared as a photographed subject at the frame edge. Treat this as a weak-case record: do not promote the route and do not patch from these branches. Future probes need stronger viewpoint ownership without making either participant a photographed side-camera subject.

Fresh-seed lower-right torso repeat: sampler seed 9595959595 retested the current generated route against body-owner wording across two visible women. The current route controls, turns 276 and 280, preserved contact, but the blonde control still exposed the male as a photographed side subject. The lower_right_torso_anchor branch repeated on turns 279 and 283: adult male viewer's own torso starts at the lower edge, runs into the lower-right foreground, and navel, abdomen hair, pelvis, and near thigh mark the camera owner's body. This improved viewpoint ownership while keeping lateral side-profile mouth contact. Mirror this lower-right torso anchor into the side-lying oral generator provisionally, keep the route queued, and continue rejecting the attractive side-camera branch as non-POV evidence.

Generated-route validation: sampler seed 9696969696 rendered the patched side-profile route directly across the same two visible women. Turns 284 and 285; turns 284 and 285 both kept the lower-right own-body foreground, navel/abdomen hair/pelvis and near thigh as camera-owner landmarks, side-profile mouth contact at the abdomen line, and coworking depth. This validates the provisional route patch against the previous photographed-male-face side-camera failure, but it is not enough to promote the pose; keep expanding across source images and seeds.

Fresh-seed promotion: sampler seed 5858585858 retested the patched generated route across three visible women, with two conservative wording branches beside each control. Generated-route controls on turns 298, 301, and 304 repeated the same usable structure: the male abdomen/navel/pelvis/near thigh remain the lower-right camera-owner body plane, the woman enters laterally in side profile, mouth contact stays at the abdomen line, and the coworking depth remains behind the bodies. The lower-edge owner branch on turns 299, 302, and 305 strengthened body ownership but did not beat the default cleanly. The side-camera-style self-body crop branch on turns 300, 303, and 306 looked strongest aesthetically, but it sits closer to the non-POV side-camera family. Promote the current generated side-profile POV hierarchy to proven and keep the side-camera-style wording as a future look branch rather than the default POV route.

Blowjob Laying Frontal / Wide V-Frame

For prone frontal oral, generic woman lies belly-down between his open thighs wording can already produce usable centered oral contact. The fixed-seed improvement is the atlas hierarchy around the viewer's thigh frame and the woman's low body line.

Useful wording:

• open thighs form a wide symmetrical V-frame from the lower corners toward the center
• pelvis and lower abdomen at the near edge
• woman lies belly-down in the gap between his thighs
• torso stretched low and horizontal
• hips and legs trailing away behind her along the center line
• hands wrap the base
• centered mouth-to-shaft contact

Fixed-seed finding: CodexMCPTest source subjects 46 and 50 with sampler seed 6767676767 improved over already-usable baselines. The baseline prompts preserved coworking continuity, hands, and centered mouth contact, but tended to read as raised-hips or all-fours rather than prone belly-down. The candidate kept the subject/outfit/office scene and strengthened the wide V-frame and low-horizontal torso hierarchy. Source 46 still kept some high-hip posture, so this is a provisional generator improvement, not a proven rule.

Blowjob Sitting Upright / Low Mouth Contact

For upright sitting oral, generic mouth aligned to the centered shaft wording can preserve the seated office layout but leave the face too high, making mouth contact implied rather than visible. The useful fixed-seed change is to make the mouth-contact point the central hierarchy while preserving the seated torso.

Useful wording:

• viewer reclines with open thighs forming the lower V-frame
• lower abdomen anchoring the near edge
• woman sits low between his open thighs
• torso upright behind the action
• face lowered close to the exact center contact point
• vertical shaft rises from the exact lower center
• open mouth covers the tip at the centerline
• both hands stay low at the base directly below her mouth

Fixed-seed finding: CodexMCPTest source subjects 46 and 50 with sampler seed 7878787878 improved when the candidate replaced high-face alignment with low-mouth seated hierarchy. Both baselines preserved coworking continuity and the viewer-thigh frame but kept the woman's face too high and hands beside the base. A first source-46 candidate that over-weighted vertical shoulders made the mouth drift farther away. The accepted wording lowered the face to the centered tip and made hands-at-base structure readable on both sources. Source 50 had some outfit looseness/drift, so this is a provisional generator improvement, not a proven rule.

Missionary Open-Leg / Seated-Lounge Drift

The first open-leg missionary A/B did not justify a generator patch. It showed that office-lounge support words can preserve coworking continuity but also push the result toward a seated or angled cushion route. That route can still be a valid missionary angle; it is just not the flatter elevated-support atlas subcase.

Useful partial cues from seed 8989898989:

• viewer between her legs from the lower foreground
• hands hold the undersides of her thighs
• open thighs form a broad V-frame around the centered contact line
• lower abdomen and hands anchor the lower foreground
• face and torso visible behind the open thighs

Weak points:

• low office-lounge sofa surface and visible sofa backs made both source subjects read like an angled lounge-seat missionary route
• the candidate improved source 50 thigh framing and hand placement, but did not materially improve source 47 over its already-strong baseline
• neither candidate fully matched the flatter elevated-support references

Follow-up prompt-axis probes on the same sampler seed showed a useful but still unproven direction. Pose-first prompts with flat floor mat, thin floor cushion, wide V-shaped tunnel, diagonal thigh rails, viewer hands grip the thighs from below, and coworking carpet, floor seams, desk legs, and chair wheels stay low around the cushion improved the flat-back and open-thigh geometry. However, those pose-first probes omitted the original subject/look block, so they only count as geometry-axis discovery. Subject-look-first follow-ups preserved the woman look better, especially with the V-shaped tunnel wording, but still stayed in the angled cushion family. Do not treat that as invalid missionary; treat it as the wrong subcase when the target is the flat elevated-support atlas view.

A subject-first follow-up batch on turns 77-80 confirmed the same weak case. Keeping the original woman/look block first preserved identity and face adherence across all four candidates, but stronger phrases like camera mounted just above the male pelvis, head, shoulders, spine, hips, and hair all resting on the same low horizontal plane, wide thigh gate, overhead first-person missionary, and thin cushion placed directly on a coworking carpet still did not beat turn 76. The best candidate, turn 80, kept coworking depth, viewer hands, and the V-frame readable, but still looked seated/upright on a cushion rather than the flat elevated-support atlas subcase.

The successful split came from atlas refs where the viewer is not reclined with thighs projecting forward. Turns 81-84 tested elevated supports and viewer edge placement. The accepted axis is:

• flat elevated support or rounded white lounge platform
• standing or braced man at the foot edge
• feet and vertical shins visible below the support edge
• legs drop down along the side edges below the support
• woman lies flat across the tabletop/platform
• hands holding her calves or outer thighs at the edge

Turn 84 was the best subject-first candidate: the woman stayed flat on one rounded platform plane, office depth remained coherent, viewer hands held the outer thighs, and the lower edge read as a support edge instead of a reclined viewer-thigh foreground. Turn 81 was useful secondary evidence with a white table/support and feet below the edge. Turn 82 is a weak branch: kneeling tightly at the foot edge hallucinated an extra male body behind her, so do not make kneeling-edge wording the primary cue. Patch only the raised-edge or edge-supported route with this elevated-support wording; keep generic missionary available for valid angled missionary views.

Missionary Folded / Contact-First Knee Block

Folded/high-leg missionary can be reached with subject-first wording, but Krea2 will often let the knees and feet become the whole image. The first fixed-seed batch on seed 8989898989 showed that compact knee block, vertical thigh columns, ankles and feet close to the camera, and hands holding calves produce folded geometry, but the visible shaft/contact can disappear.

The accepted follow-up axis from turn 89 is contact-first:

• viewer lower abdomen anchors the bottom edge
• large centered shaft rising from the lower center
• shaft/contact enters the exposed vulva below the folded knees
• both knees folded tightly toward her chest into one compact knee block
• viewer hands hold her calves
• face, breasts, and torso remain visible behind the raised knees

Turn 89 was the strongest combined result: it preserved the same subject/look and coworking platform, recovered a visible lower-center shaft/contact, and kept the knees folded high as a compact block. Turn 92 was useful secondary evidence for pelvis/shaft anchoring, but the fold was looser. Prefer the turn-89 hierarchy over abstract penetration line wording. Mirror it only into the folded-missionary route as a provisional patch; keep generic missionary and elevated-edge missionary separate.

Cowgirl Frontal / Wide Thigh Bridge

Frontal cowgirl is not currently a structural generator failure. On seed 8989898989, the generic subject-first baseline already produced a valid woman-on-top POV: the viewer was underneath, the woman faced him, torso stayed upright, coworking depth remained coherent, and lower-center contact was readable.

The useful atlas refinement is the wide-thigh silhouette. For refs like 5.cowgirl/100_cowgirl.png and 5.cowgirl/101_cowgirl.png, prefer:

• viewer reclines underneath her
• viewer lower abdomen and pelvis at the bottom edge
• wide horizontal thigh bridge from left edge to right edge
• knees planted outside the viewer's hips
• torso upright above the centered contact point
• centered shaft contact below her belly
• viewer hands gripping the sides of her thighs

Turn 95 was the strongest same-seed candidate because it made the thighs span the lower frame while preserving contact, subject/look, and coworking context. Turn 96 was useful secondary evidence for hands-on-hips/contact-centered wording, but it did not improve the wide straddling silhouette as much.

Matrix update: sampler seed 2828282828 repeated the wide-thigh bridge hierarchy across two visible women. Turns 208 and 212 were already valid generic frontal cowgirl baselines with coherent coworking depth and centered contact. Turns 209 and 213 improved the atlas silhouette by making the thighs span left edge to right edge while preserving the viewer-underneath body cues, upright torso, centered contact, and coworking setting. Turn 209 was strongest because the viewer hands gripped both outer thighs; turn 213 repeated the wide bridge with cleaner face/torso readability but weaker hand visibility. Mirror the wide-thigh bridge hierarchy into the normal cowgirl generator route provisionally. This is still a candidate route because the baseline is already valid and another seed/source expansion should repeat the refinement before promotion.

Generated-route validation: turn 216 used the patched normal cowgirl route and preserved the full hierarchy: viewer lower abdomen and pelvis at the bottom edge, hands gripping the outer thighs, wide thigh bridge across the foreground, upright torso, centered contact below her belly, and coworking depth. Keep this route patch provisional because it refines an already-valid baseline rather than fixing a structural route failure.

Fresh-seed promotion: sampler seed 9191919191 repeated the patched normal cowgirl route across turns 242-249 and two visible women. Turns 242 and 246 used the generated-route wording directly and stayed valid: viewer-low body ownership, lower abdomen/pelvis at the bottom edge, centered contact below her belly, upright torso, coworking depth, and visible hand/thigh support. Turns 242, 243, 244, and 248 were the clearest atlas-like repeats for the wide horizontal thigh sweep. Turn 247 was still valid cowgirl, but one side did not span edge-to-edge as strongly. Treat the normal frontal cowgirl wide-thigh bridge route as proven. Keep cowgirl-alt, reverse-cowgirl, and reverse-cowgirl-alt separate because their atlas orientation is different.

Cowgirl Alt / Flat Supine Low Angle

Cowgirl-alt should not be scored only by squat depth or contact clarity. The atlas refs repeatedly show the man/viewer flat on his back while the woman is mounted over him, and the room background proves the camera is low: ceiling, upper walls, overhead lights, or high window/partition lines sit behind her upper body.

Same-seed turns 97-100 showed the weak case. Low-squat wording produced coherent woman-on-top images, and turn 99 improved supported-under-thigh shape, but the background still read too much like a platform or high camera. Do not accept that as cowgirl-alt just because contact and bent knees are readable.

The accepted turn 104 hierarchy is:

• viewer lies flat on his back underneath her
• lens sits low at the viewer's abdomen looking upward from his pelvis
• viewer abdomen and chest lie flat at the bottom edge
• woman mounted over him facing him
• knees bent wide and close to the camera
• ceiling lights, upper walls, or high glass partition lines behind her
• centered contact below her belly

Patch only the cowgirl-alt route with this flat-supine/low-angle wording. Normal frontal cowgirl can remain a higher, cleaner woman-on-top straddle when the background still reads like a platform or elevated support.

Reverse Cowgirl / Close Back-Hip Dominant

Generic reverse-cowgirl wording is not enough for Krea2. On seed 8989898989, turn 105 included facing away, viewer-underneath contact, and coworking depth, but the woman still rendered as frontal cowgirl. The route needs the back-facing straddle hierarchy before generic contact language.

For normal reverse cowgirl refs like cowgirl_reverse/101_cowgirl_reverse.png, cowgirl_reverse/106_cowgirl_reverse.png, and cowgirl_reverse/1_cowgirl_reverse.png, prefer:

• woman sits on the viewer's pelvis facing away
• back, hips, and ass are the nearest largest shapes to the camera
• viewer thighs frame the lower corners
• centered contact sits directly between her thighs below her ass
• her thighs spread to either side of the viewer's hips
• partial over-shoulder glance only after the back-facing straddle is locked

Turn 106 was the strongest same-seed candidate because it turned the frontal baseline into a close back/hip-dominant straddle while preserving subject/look, office depth, viewer-underneath legs, and centered contact. Turn 107 was a valid secondary viewer-leg-frame variant, but a little farther back and more upright. Turn 108 is useful secondary evidence for refs with an over-shoulder glance.

Patch only the normal reverse-cowgirl route with this close back/hip hierarchy. Keep reverse-cowgirl-alt separate: the alt atlas family is more upright and seated, with the vertical back/shoulders and viewer hands or thighs forming a cleaner seated straddle frame.

Reverse Cowgirl Alt / Upright Seated Back-Facing

Reverse-cowgirl-alt is the upright seated branch, not just another close crop of normal reverse cowgirl. The atlas refs such as cowgirl_reversere_alt/100_cowgirl_reversere_alt.png, cowgirl_reversere_alt/101_cowgirl_reversere_alt.png, and cowgirl_reversere_alt/102_cowgirl_reversere_alt.png keep the woman's back and shoulders vertical and readable above the hips, with the viewer's thighs and often hands forming the lower seated straddle frame.

On seed 8989898989, turn 109 showed that a subject-first upright baseline already hits the route. Turn 110 was the strongest atlas-alt wording because it added viewer hands on both hips while preserving the vertical back, centered ass-over-pelvis placement, viewer thigh V-frame, centered contact, and coworking depth.

Prefer:

• POV upright reverse cowgirl back-facing penetration position
• woman sits upright facing away in a back-facing straddle
• back stays vertical and readable above her hips
• viewer hands hold both sides of her hips
• viewer thighs frame the lower corners
• centered contact remains visible below her ass
• office desks, glass partitions, plants, or tall-window light behind her upright back

Use over-shoulder glance wording only as a secondary refinement. Turn 112 was a strong over-shoulder variant, but the core route should first preserve the upright seated back-facing silhouette.

POV Doggy / Rear-Entry

For doggy-style POV, visible viewer thighs, lower torso, or pelvis can be correct. Real POV references often show them. The useful target is not removing the viewer body, but making the body cues read as a standing or crouched first-person viewpoint instead of a vague seated pose.

To push the reference closer to a standing or crouched man looking down, use a top-down rear-entry structure:

• top-down standing POV doggy position from behind
• camera looks down over the viewer's extended hands onto the woman's raised hips
• woman is on all fours with chest low, forearms folded, cheek turned sideways
• rear-entry penetration visible between raised hips
• face and mouth remain far ahead, clearly separated from the penis

Do not use visible shoes or lower legs as the standing cue. Seed 65 showed that adding shoes/lower legs made Krea2 drift into oral contact and lose the rear-entry geometry.

Do not over-prompt viewer torso and thighs outside frame; seeds 65 and 6602 showed Krea2 still draws lower-body POV cues, and real references support that. Prefer framing them as plausible foreground body cues rather than trying to suppress them.

Stronger-Control / Low-Priority Cases

Some atlas routes are useful to catalog but are not good prompt-only tuning targets yet. Keep these out of the normal fixed-seed prompt queue until easier pose families are covered.

Sixty-Nine / Close Reversed POV

pov_sixty_nine_close_reversed_oral is currently the hardest and low-priority atlas route. It should be treated as a pose/control image or image-guided route first, not a normal prompt-only fixed-seed candidate.

The repeated atlas geometry is close and specific: the visible partner is reversed over the viewer, hips closest to the camera, head and torso receding away into the upper frame, and the viewer face or mouth anchoring the lower foreground. Text-only prompting can collapse this into generic oral contact or lose the reversed-over-viewer body arrangement.

Style

Style should describe rendering, not camera mechanics.

Use style presets to choose between:

• natural photo,
• creator/social-media photo,
• documentary/direct-flash photo,
• cinematic realism,
• illustration/comic.

If a controlled camera is active, avoid style suffixes that imply a conflicting camera such as phone photo or handheld selfie.

Guide Update Format

When adding a new rule, include:

• observed prompt,
• observed image failure,
• edited prompt wording,
• image improvement or regression,
• generator path if known,
• final rule.